We all want clean, affordable, accessible, safe and efficient ways to get around. Our transportation systems are a crucial part of everyone’s lives. They enable us to see family and friends, go to work, and access essential services. When not at their best, these systems can also make it harder to do those things, and can in fact cause health and safety problems.
We all rely on transportation, and we must confront the fact that transportation fuels are responsible for well over a third of our climate and harmful air pollution in the Pacific Northwest—accounting for 39% of Washington’s annual greenhouse gas emissions and 35% of Oregon’s. Health professionals directly link this air pollution to asthma, lung cancer and other diseases. Due to racist public policies such as redlining and inner-city highway construction, toxic concentrations of diesel pollution in busy trucking corridors, bus depots, distribution hubs, and seaports disproportionately affect low-income and communities of color. Cleaning up transportation pollution will cut climate pollution, improving public health while addressing environmental racism in our transportation system.
Transitioning to electricity as a fuel
Shifting to zero-emission vehicles that get their power from clean energy is critical to cleaning our air and our transportation system. Achieving this vision means electrifying vehicles of all types and sizes, including but not limited to personal vehicles, medium- and heavy-duty trucks, construction and agriculture equipment, school and transit buses, and more.
TRUCKS AND BUSES. Medium- and heavy-duty vehicles account for a disproportionate amount of climate and air pollution in both Oregon and Washington. In Oregon, diesel trucks, buses, and delivery vans currently pump out 70% of smog pollution (NOx), 64% of black carbon, and nearly half (42%) of climate pollution from our transportation sector, yet they’re fewer than 10% of all vehicles on the road. The numbers are similar in Washington: though these vehicles are only about 10% of those on the road, they account for 30% of climate pollution from transportation, 50% of particulate matter pollution, and 60% of NOx pollution.. Getting zero-emission trucks on the road is a public health imperative, which is why we need to invest rapidly in cleaning up the delivery trucks, transit and school buses, big rigs and other large vehicles that drive on our highways and through our neighborhoods. Replacing dirty diesel-powered trucks with their zero-emission counterparts (battery electric and, in certain use cases, electrolytic hydrogen fuel cell) can clean the air we breathe, reduce climate emissions, and create green jobs.
CARS. Our personal vehicles need to be clean as well—otherwise, we simply will not achieve our climate goals. Electrifying our cars has benefits beyond protecting our climate; it will cut air pollution, improve health, and significantly reduce our ongoing transportation costs. Electric vehicles cost far less to fuel—approximately $1/gallon equivalent when compared with gas-powered cars. They also require less maintenance. Both Washington and Oregon have adopted the Advanced Clean Cars II policy which requires that all passenger vehicles sold by model year 2035 are zero-emission. It is essential that everyone who needs to drive is able to access an electric vehicle and charging, no matter whether they rent, live in an apartment, or are lower-income. Therefore, we must continue to advocate for increased public charging and targeted vehicle incentives.
MARINE VESSELS. If viewed as a country, the marine sector would be the 6th largest contributor to global climate pollution, about 3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Recent figures of the global marine industry estimate that more than 60,000 commercial vessels are moving 11 billion metric tons of cargo annually. Left unchecked, global shipping pollution is projected to increase by 20-50% between 2008 and 2050 in business-as-usual scenarios. State-based approaches to marine emissions exist. Thanks to the state’s powerful influence in being able to set vehicle emission standards that are stronger than the federal government’s, California has been leading the way in targeting marine pollution through policies that require large commercial vessels to use electric shore power and burn a lower sulfur fuel.
AIRPLANES. Globally, aviation accounts for 3.5% percent of climate pollution, a figure that could triple by 2050 without concerted action to curb emissions. Accordingly, a comprehensive solution to the world’s climate predicament requires a strategy to reduce aviation’s carbon footprint. In addition to developing clean aviation alternatives, fueling aircraft with clean fuels is an imperative. Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is a cleaner-burning, lower-emitting fuel–to qualify for federal tax credits, it must reduce life-cycle emissions by 50%. SAF can be produced from waste products, such as used cooking oil. Electric airplanes may be an option, particularly for shorter routes; prototypes are under development, including in Washington. It will take concerted research and investments to transition aviation off of fossil fuels, but it is necessary.
Increasing clean, comfortable, and convenient transportation options
Climate Solutions’ original research for the Pacific Northwest shows that shifting basically all of our vehicles to run on electricity is essential—and this is backed up by other major national and international studies. That task becomes easier and leads to greater benefits if we also expand transportation options beyond individual vehicles. We need to make it possible to get around safely, accessibly, affordably, and efficiently by walking, riding a bike or scooter, and taking convenient, comfortable transit. People should also be able to live near where they work or their activities and needs, which requires ample housing in urban areas. Reducing the amount we need to drive to work and access essential services such as visiting the doctor or going to the grocery store not only reduces our climate pollution, but also cuts congestion, reduces car crashes, and increases our quality of life.
Priorities for Transportation Advocacy
Northwest states have seen transportation policy successes in the past few years. Both Oregon and Washington now have Clean Fuel Standards, which require a decrease in the carbon intensity of transportation fuels, promoting cleaner fuels, including electricity. Both states have also adopted the Advanced Clean Truck Rule and Advanced Clean Cars II, which require an increasing percentage of new vehicle sales to be zero-emission. All new passenger vehicle sales must be zero-emission by model year 2035.
Both states also need to continue investments in zero-emission vehicles, both through federal and state funding. While both states have passed significant legislation and rules in the past few years to accelerate adoption of electric vehicles, the medium- and heavy-duty sector (e.g., semi-trucks, buses, delivery trucks) is not nearly as far along the transition to electric as the light-duty sector (passenger cars). This is a critical transition to curb air pollution and improve health in our communities, as well as to reduce climate pollution. Recently, Washington and Oregon have allocated funds to incentivize the purchase of zero-emission medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and start to build out the needed charging infrastructure. We continue to work on investments in a comprehensive charging network and on programs that allow low-income people to access electric vehicles.
Land use policy plays a significant role in ensuring that people are able to live near services and where they work. We need more housing in urban areas; that means allowing more transit-oriented development, duplexes and triplexes, and other flexible housing types. The cost of building new housing should also not be inflated through unnecessary parking minimums or design review practices.
In addition to statewide policy solutions, we are working with local governments, transit districts, and utility providers to improve clean transportation options. Utilities can accelerate transportation electrification through their own investments in building more publicly accessible charging stations, promoting financial incentives for individual and fleet EV purchases, supporting electric transportation options and programs that are inclusive to community needs, and aiding encouraging transit agencies in buying zero-emission electric buses. Local governments can showcase leadership by transitioning their own fleets to zero-emission, by supporting safe walking and biking infrastructure, and by funding transit options.
Tailpipe exhaust is responsible for nearly half of Washington state’s climate and air pollution--call it a sin of emission. We can reverse the trend by passing a Clean Fuel Standard--just as Oregon, California and BC have already done.
We won major climate and clean energy victories in 2019, but we are entering 2020 with a list of unfinished business in both Washington and Oregon. Here's how we're going on the offense this year for climate progress.
A growing list of states and territories have adopted carbon pricing policies, enacted more robust low-carbon fuel standards, and committed to a timeline for transitioning to 100% clean electricity, but Oregon is not among them.
Give for a brighter future
Join our email list to learn about what we do and how to get involved.
• Our report: Transforming Transportation: How to cut our pollution and achieve our climate goals in Washington and Oregon
• Pathways to cut pollution
• Are we ready to handle all-electric transportation?